This, however, has translated only into a frustrating third place in Olympic medal standings. The UK has also subsidized Olympic sports after London 2012, but although its medal standing has significantly improved in Rio, studies show a decrease in sports participation overall, suggesting a probable drop in their results by Tokyo 2020. By comparison, the USA leads the current and all-timetable, although its Olympic program is one almost entirely privately funded with the exception of small sums offered in support of Paralympic athleteswith the USA being one of the few countries in the world without a department or a ministry of sports as such. Sports excellence is a matter of both natural and acquired aptitudes, which benefits from well-directed capital investment in training people with a comparative advantage in the field. That is why there are some useful parallels to be drawn between the Olympic programs and the management of international trade.International trade is based on comparative advantage, which is discovered and developed in the market by entrepreneurs directing their capital investment to the most productive activities.There is no need for departments of international trade, Chambers of Commerce, Export-Import Banks, complicated trade partnerships, or world organizations to encourage or manage trade. In fact, government schemes are powerless in gauging where comparative advantage lies at any particular point in time, whether we are talking about trade or sports. click thisThis is a question for the entrepreneurs, concerning how to employ and direct their resources. Being future oriented and thus speculative, as well as requiring time to be brought to fruition, specialization is a process permeated with uncertainty, tributary to human error, and subject to frequent modifications. Therefore, the concrete pattern of specialization, whether it be in international trade or Olympic events, cannot be ascertained outside the market nexus: it is through the profit and loss system that consumers can sanction the relevance of specialization decisions which are contingent on the incessant change of their preferences. With government intervention coming from outside the market nexus, and as government policymakers are not entrepreneurs, trade (and sports) policies aiming to interfere with this pattern of comparative advantage are doomed to fail. Even if occasionally, and for a short while, government programs can accidentally stumble upon correct decisions, both trade and sports can counterfactually perform much better if left to their own devices.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit https://mises.org/blog/what-olympics-teach-us-about-international-trade
According to previous reports, since Hart again failed this year to meet TEAs accountability standards, the Hart ISD School Board now must implement that two-year campus turnaround plan. In March, Christine Scroggs from the Region 16 Education Service Center in Amarillo told Hart ISD trustees that their campus turnaround plan had to include details on the method for restructuring, reforming or reconstituting the campus. In other words, the plan had to detail what would be done to improve student test scores. Scroggs said that the campus turnaround plan is a result of State House Bill 1842, which requires interventions and a timeline for developing and implementing a Turnaround Plan. That is being implemented hopefully to avoid further sanctions by the Texas Commissioner of Education, which could include closure of the school or the appointment of a Board of Managers to take it over. If the campus turnaround plan does not improve the unacceptable academic ratings by the beginning of the 2018-19 school year, Hart ISD officials have said that the Commissioner of Education will order: Appointment of a board of managers to govern the district; Alternative management of the campus; or Closure of the campus According to the Associated Press, the Texas Education Agency has tweaked accountability ratings to ensure few failing “improvement required” ratings, meaning that 90-plus percent of districts and around 85 percent of schools have now met basic state requirements each of the last four years. That’s despite Education Commissioner Mike Morath suggesting only about a third of high school graduates in the country’s second most-populous state are actually ready to succeed in college or an immediate career or vocation. “It’s just like children’s soccer nowadays, where everyone gets a trophy,” Bill Hammond, a former state lawmaker who now heads the Texas Association of Business lobbying group, said of Monday’s ratings. “It doesn’t tell the public anything because there’s no differentiation between the various schools.” Texas State Teachers Association spokesman Clay Robison countered that those schools and districts flagged for failing to meet state standards have traditionally been concentrated in poor areas and have disproportionate numbers of minority students, or those who speak foreign languages at home and require extra instruction to learn English. He said the problem will only get worse when the state starts handing out Fs. “They call it differentiation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.myplainview.com/news/article_de5f4a02-63f2-11e6-b8ca-53cdcbb92fdf.html